In a significant change of direction, the director of the Island Affordable Housing Fund, Ewell Hopkins, is looking to large-scale affordable rental projects rather than home ownership developments as a solution to the Vineyard’s chronic housing problem.
And as money for affordable development from the traditional source, private donations, has dried up, he is turning instead to other sources, specifically the federal government and the largest national nonprofit developer of affordable rental housing.
The approach he is proposing could hardly be more different. Instead of local, private funds, he is looking to national, public funds. Instead of building houses a few at a time he is talking about building rental properties by the dozens in tightly-clustered villages.
If people on the Island can come to terms with the shift, Mr. Hopkins said, there is money out there to help ease the Island’s housing crisis. Lots of money.
But for it all to come together, he said, it will require a shift in thinking toward acceptance of large, high-density, rental projects. He said it will require an acceptance that some of the zoning practices on the Island are “archaic” and working against the affordable housing mission. And he said it will require authorities to think about the Island as a whole instead of six towns.
Mr. Hopkins already has identified three potential sites for such development: the moribund Bridge Commons project on State Road in Vineyard Haven, the Southern Woodlands in Oak Bluffs and the abandoned Cozy Hearth development in the outskirts of Edgartown.
Currently the developers at Bridge Commons have 14.9 acres of land and completed plans for 22 affordable houses, a debt of some $2 million and a written promise from Mr. Hopkins’s predecessor as director of the fund, Patrick Manning, of more than $1 million to be made available in the first quarter of 2009.
Mr. Manning has long since decamped and the fund has no money to make good on the promise, leaving the development at the mercy of its creditor, Boston Community Capital, which has so far extended the loan. How much longer it will do so is uncertain.
“The irony is money is no longer the challenge,” said Mr. Hopkins. “Money is available for certain types of smart-growth development targeting certain groups and incomes.”
And certain types of projects. The federal money Mr. Hopkins has identified is for rental housing.
“The focus is all on rental, for a multi-unit approach,” he said. “There’s not that much money out there for home ownership right now.”
With some redesigning, Mr. Hopkins feels certain the Bridge Commons project could still be viable.
And in recent weeks, he has diligently been courting various parties who could help make it happen.
“I’ve been authorized by the [Bridge Housing] board to negotiate on their behalf,” he said.
“I’ve talked to the finance service that owns the note [on the land]. I met on Jan. 4 with the largest affordable property developer in the country, Community Builders. The next day I flew to Washington for [new Congressman William] Keating’s swearing-in. I’ve been doing a lot of work on him advocating the housing needs of the community.”
And he has been to the Tisbury selectmen to inform them of his intentions.
“I’m trying to bring some kind of convergence,” Mr. Hopkins said.
“If I could get town support for Bridge . . . I know the money is there. All the other parts are there. No question.”
“Community Builders has received over $80 million this year from the Feds to do this kind of work. Thirteen million of the funds are earmarked exclusively for Massachusetts. We could get a part of that.”
The problem is scale. For Bridge to work as a stand-alone development, Mr. Hopkins said it would need to comprise not 22 houses, but “at least 35 to 40 units . . . to make the numbers work.”
Affordable rental accommodation, he said, needs economies of scale.
“You must have that, so [the rental properties] generate enough income to support themselves, with a standard of maintenance that the larger community would expect,” he said.
“That translates into a certain level of density. If you allow denser design formats you can share septic systems, for example, maximize the use of public transport and minimize the destruction of natural habitat.”
“The question is finding a way to do this with political and community support,” he said.
“It’s really difficult to make Bridge stand on its own . . . because when people see plans for 30 or 40 rental units they immediately put up blinds.”
One answer, said Mr. Hopkins, is to bring on other projects in other places on the Island at the same time. He calls it the “scattered campus” model.
Hence his interest in the other two areas of land as well. If all two or three were developed, each could be a little smaller, and still allow the developers to make those economies of scale.
There are issues with the other two areas as well though.
In the case of the Southern Woodlands area in Oak Bluffs, there is a complex issue of land title.
The town owns 24 acres which was designated years ago for affordable housing and is now is surrounded by land bank land. The property has no access. The town and land bank agreed in 2004 to a land swap where the town would give the land bank the so-called doughnut hole in exchange for land with access near the ice rink.
But Oak Bluffs has been slow to establish that it has clear title. And the land swap would have to be approved by the state legislature.
“Community Builders have walked the property with me. They’re very interested. That land, in conjunction with Bridge, makes the numbers work responsibly,” said Mr. Hopkins.
“The third one is the old proposed Cozy Hearth development near the airport.”
Island businessman Bill Bennett wanted to build 11 houses there, but only won approval for nine units.
“Bill Bennett’s out of it, he’s done, the land is for sale,” said Mr. Hopkins.
“So there’s 10 acres that has permitting for affordable housing on it.
“The big question is whether Martha’s Vineyard as a whole wants to embrace those types of initiatives — is there really a place called Martha’s Vineyard, or is it just six towns?
This article appears in January 21, 2011.

This proposed direction toward high-density rental housing is counter to the Vineyard’s history and character. To call existing zoning and housing regulations archaic and against affordable housing’s mission is a smokescreen to subvert our island’s heritage and traditions to suit progressive sensibilities. Please stop.
More affordable houseing??? We have to much.. What is the vacancy rate at Morgan Woods?? We dont need affordable housing… Sure there are going be folks who want something for nothing.. that is why we are in the state we are financially.. to many people getting something for nothing and to little of folks paying in… It is real simple math… but some just dont get it… The sad thing as homeowners we always take the hit….
I would like to ask Mr. Hopkins how is Mr. Patrick Manning doing and what did that fiasco cost us?? How many $$$$ did this guy walk away with?? Funny thing we were all told how lucky we were to have him, right up until the end. He was like a used car sales man looking looking for his fat commission. This story got totally swept under the rug. hmmm what a JOKE!
Sid, I could not say it any better. No more FREE HOUSING… I am tired of it. I have a neighboor that got a lot for next to nothing few years ago and he complains that he still has to pay taxes on the land. No more Lottery lots of houses.
“YOU CANNOT AFFORD SOMETHING YOU JUST DONT BUY IT”
I agree with Sid no more affordable housing. Whatever that really means. Morgan Woods is such a great story. I hear that there is opening in there???
Our local goverments are straped and then we have this organization looking for more $$$ to give free handouts.. I agree no more fancy muncipal buildings, librarys,etc.. no more excessive spending.. Towns need to say no to the so called non profits!!
Mr Manning I hear is doing well and from my understanding he walked away with over 1/2 million dollars plus benefits.. not bad for the “non profit” organization. This is like the MVC..
Leagalized Extortion..
I agree. Anyone who has a house or apt to rent knows that the times have changed. Rents are decreasing, property values dropping, and houses are sitting un-rented andvacant. Why build more ?
Vineyarders have always stressed holding back development of this island. ‘Affordable housing’ is still housing, using land, adding cars, stressing services. Build it and they will come.
Mr. Hopkins,
Not so fast.. Doubtful there is “lots” of Fed money available While a noble cause subsidised housing is not the hot button cause it once was.. think avoiding foreclouser ..
Craig it is time for OB to get out of the MVC get a pettion together and put it on the warrant this spring.
What the Island needs are more seasonal owners who add to the tax base without a demand for town funded resources. I would love to see a novel MVC commission rule that links building permits to open inventory. The construction industry would scream but we don’t need to make it easier for people to afford to live on the Vineyard. Instead let’s find a way to attract more people who can afford to be here. This is not elitist–just practical.
where will your servants live who slip your toes and tote your baggage?
Ease the Islands housing crisis?? What is this guy talking about… No more affordable housing go get the money that Mr. Manning walked away with.
We have to much “affordable” housing… I would like some real estate tax releif before we give away any more free housing…
Mr Hopkins give it a break people are on to your “affordable housing sceme”
I cannot agree more with Bruce. No more affordable housing. We give all this property away over the years to affordable housing and now we have shortfall in all the communitys. We cannot afford to be giveing away a thing. All I see is my property taxes going up and up.. and evalutions going down. Mr. Hopkins close the door on free housing… people who work hard and pay there bills and then they hear or see someone walking into a free lot or discounted rentals is wrong.
I agree you cant afford something you dont buy.. wow that is what my parents taugh tme and there parents taught them…. I hope to show my children the same way..
I have a neighboor who won a free lot in the so called lottery process and then went out and mortgaged the propert to the hill.. what happened the owner walked away and then the propert was foreclosed on…where was the affordable housing people then.. we spend away to much time thinking planning on how to give away property..
Since moving to California 25 years ago, I haven’t been back to the Vineyard as much as I would like, but I keep up with the Gazette. It seems like rampant development will ruin the natural, beautiful island I remember.
I cannot agree more with the fact I am tired of hearing about affordable housing. I am just barely getting by paying my bills and taxes to the town. Then I hear we need more affordable housing. We need less affordable housing. We need these people to stop leeching on soceity.
as for Mr. Manning who was suppose to be “the best person for the job”
is laughing all the way to the bank. He saw the writing on the wall. He drained the organization dry and left. I hope our citizens and selectman boycott any further expansion of affordable housing
Where or where did anyone ever get the idea that “we” have to provide for every guy who gets of the boat and wants a house here?
If you can’t afford to live here……..live elsewhere. We are NOT responsible for your housing!
Please, stop this insanity!
MV supported Barry Obama for President now its time for MV to have some of its wealth redistributed.
I would love to live on St. Bart’s, or have a brownstone in Gramercy Park, I simply can’t afford either place. But maybe you folks on the vineyard can make it possible for me to live where I would like to live. Thanks. I appreciate any help, and financial support you can give me.