map

There’s been a great deal of focus lately on the local effects of the rush by federal and state authorities to build big wind farms near the Vineyard to ameliorate climate change, but very little focus on the local effects of climate change itself.

Except in Oak Bluffs, where there is quiet work underway to prepare for the worst, including sea level rise that is expected to erase beachfront property as it is now known, and the potentially ruinous effects of extreme storms caused by climate change. And it’s all backed by a state grant.

But first consider for a minute what a three-foot rise in sea level would mean to the Vineyard. Much of downtown Vineyard Haven and Edgartown would be inundated. Likewise the Crystal Lake and Farm Pond areas of Oak Bluffs. Most of Lobsterville would be under water, along with a lot of land on the flat shores of the Great Ponds. Hines Point would be an island and the new drawbridge cut off. State Beach would be largely gone, as would the beachfront at Quansoo and elsewhere.

A three-foot rise in sea level over the next century is now the general consensus among climate scientists, but some predict much more.

Chris Seidel, the cartographer at the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, has mapped out how the Island’s shape would change if the waters came up three or six feet. It’s an arresting document.

Experts say the lead times on climate change mean actions must be taken soon to limit consequences decades hence. And some effects of climate change, like extreme weather, are expected to be manifest much sooner.

Ms. Seidel has also produced maps which plot the location of structures on the Island against so-called SLOSH (Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes) maps from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Her works shows that 3,200 buildings on the Vineyard sit on land which could be inundated by the storm surge of a category four hurricane. Even a category one storm would put almost 400 buildings at risk.

A category two storm would cut off all routes but one to the Martha’s Vineyard Hospital.

Factor in higher sea levels and more frequent, stronger storms, and the magnitude of the planning problem begins to come into focus.

And Oak Bluffs is the one Island town that is doing something about it.

Last year Oak Bluffs became one of eight pilot communities working with the state office of Coastal Zone Management’s Storm Smart Coast program. Next week the fruits of that collaboration will be presented to Oak Bluffs selectmen, and later, assuming no glitches, to the annual town meeting.

What they came up with sounds a bit dry: amendments to the town’s floodplain overlay districts bylaw. But it could provide a strong foundation for dealing with future sea level rise.

In a nutshell, the proposed changes seek to limit building in areas likely to be flooded. Landowners in the most at-risk areas (designated V and AO zones) would not be allowed to expand their homes and would need special permission even to make significant repairs. The owners of parcels which now have no structures on them would not be allowed to build.

Homeowners in less risky areas (the A zone) within the floodplain would need a special permit before they could extend or do other work.

In total, about 190 parcels of land will be immediately affected by the changes.

“Currently, there are 138 residential parcels with development currently on them, which have the majority of their land in the A zone,” said Oak Bluffs conservation agent Liz Durkee, who was the driving force behind the collaboration with Storm Smart.

In the more stringently-restricted zones, she said, there are currently 37 built parcels and 13 undeveloped lots.

The purpose of the exercise, Ms. Durkee said, is to get more clarity into the process and to begin preparing for a future of higher sea levels and worse storms. And the floodplain bylaw changes are one part of a bigger suite of measures, including beach replenishment and a major rethink of how the coast can be protected from erosion, aimed at protecting the town, its infrastructure and environment.

“We want to be at the forefront of developing proactive, science-based floodplain protection measures in light of what is already happening, which is climate change,” Ms. Durkee said, adding:

“We’re basing our project on an anticipated sea level rise of three feet before the end of the century. That was considered to be at the upper end of estimates only a couple of years ago, but now the science is saying that’s a conservative estimate.

“The ice is melting, the seawater is warming and expanding and rising faster than the experts anticipated. It’s really kind of frightening. The Storm Smart program is designed to help Oak Bluffs be prepared for the impacts.”

This will affect health, safety and emergency services, roads, bridges and other infrastructure, surface and groundwater quality, beaches and dunes, master planning.

“That’s why we’re updating our regulations — to minimize threats to public health and safety, increase the town’s capacity to bounce back after a storm by reducing damage to personal and public property, protect the economy by lowering clean-up costs, and preserve recreation areas and quality of life,” Ms. Durkee said.

Ms. Durkee said the bylaw changes would not be draconian for most landowners.

“The vast majority are not going to be affected at all,” she said.

“And most of the people who are affected are in the A zone. If they want to do things to their property or expand their building, they would have to go to the zoning board of appeals for a special permit.”

That would be simply to ensure any construction meets current federal and state codes for structural integrity in a flood zone.

“That protects the homeowners as well as public health and safety,” Ms. Durkee said.

And while she conceded people living in the V and AO zones would be much more restricted, she said: “Not a lot of properties are affected by this.”

In fact, most already are limited in what they can do.

Most, if not all, the unbuilt lots already are unbuildable under current state and town regulations.

“For example, some are on a barrier beach, and you can’t under wetlands laws build a structure on a barrier beach in this day and age,” Ms. Durkee said.

But while the immediate effects of the bylaw changes are relatively minor, they can be expected in the future to affect many more than the 190-odd properties now within the floodplain boundaries, simply because as sea level rises, the floodplain too increases in size.

“We have to base our information on current FEMA [the Federal Emergency Management Agency] maps, because that is what FEMA national flood insurance program uses, and the town,” Ms. Durkee said.

But those maps are at least 20 years old, she said, and need to be updated. More than a decade ago, FEMA began work on revising the maps which form the basis of its flood insurance, assuming a one to three-foot rise in sea level, and a consequent, equal increase in the height of flooding.

“Because of all the hurricanes and storm damage in the South in the past few years, FEMA has been concentrating on them,” she said. “Updating flood maps in this part of the world seems not to be a priority. As part of this program we want to get FEMA moving on our updated maps.”

Instead of waiting for that to happen, though, Oak Bluffs began its own assessment of the risk, based on its assessors maps and with Ms. Seidel’s help.

The recently released Island Plan prepared by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission advocates limits on construction in areas likely to be affected by sea level rise.

It also notes that the relative rise in sea level would be almost twice as great here as in most places around the globe, because the Island is actually subsiding at a rate roughly equal to the current rate of the waters’ rise.

So far, though, Oak Bluffs is the only town to have proposed significant steps. Ms. Durkee hopes the MVC and other towns will follow suit.

“All the Island towns have such a mishmash of regulations and overlays and different departments that look at things in different ways,” Ms. Durkee said. “We need to plan for these changes.

“If roads get eroded away, how are people going to get to the hospital? How are rescue personnel going to get to people? What do we do if houses on the shoreline get damaged, if beaches are disappearing?”

Public health and safety issues cross town lines.

The issues are complex, but as Ms. Durkee said, the essential concern is simple.

“When you live on an Island,” she said, “you have to be concerned that the sea is rising.”

 

Join the Conversation

18 Comments

  1. I’m amazed that there are still people who believe in climate change. It’s been proven to be a fraud yet the believers are blind to the facts.

  2. Well, ‘Thinker’ has really lifted the veil on his unique perspective. Global Warming just a fraud? I guess that is why virtually the entire scientific community, worldwide has confirmed its existence. But what do they know compared to a few YouTube videos?
    I am sure Thinker can entertain us with a few conspiracy theories.

  3. Over 32,000 scientists – 9000 of them PHD’s – have signed a petition denying that there is scientific evidence of man made global warming. Here is a brief list scientists who have expressed doubts about the theory of man made climate change:
    Sallie Baliunas, astronomer, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics:

    Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences:

    Garth Paltridge, Visiting Fellow ANU and retired Chief Research Scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired Director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre

    Hendrik Tennekes, retired Director of Research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute:

    Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists

    David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester:

    William Happer, physicist Princeton University:

    Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

  4. Global Warming (Climategate) is a Fraud: Somebody Needs to Go to Jail and those who are still enabling them and this belief should be put in a Taunton State Mental Hospital!

    Here is some Good reading & hopefully you leftwing, Kool Aid drinking, Obama supporting radicals stop this insanity now! It is really not funny anymore we have children that must learn the truth, like, the island was under over two miles of solid Ice 10,000 years ago and that was way before Bush was around!

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/

    PS. If you dont believe me, just ask our new Senator Scott Brown!

  5. Now Thinker changes his tune – he starts out by denying the existence of “CLIMATE CHANGE” and then provides proof that some learned scientists deny the existence of “MAN MADE global warming”……does it really matter who or what causes the seas to rise 3 feet? In the end we will all be under water!
    So much for Thinker’s thought process……

  6. Global Warming HA,HA hahaHAhah. I am on the “Island Home” returning to the island! I was in Washington DC, heard about the 100 year old Snow Storm coming and as soon as Scott Brown got sworn in we made a bee-line out of the city and headed home!
    Called my son and his wife still down there (they live there) and they are expecting 30 inces of fresh snow within the next 24 hours!
    So much for Global Warming! HahahahHahah.
    I wonder what Holly S has to say about this?

  7. The Truth hurts for the believers:

    Scam Scam Scam: European Parliament Member Rips Global Warming Hysteria

    The Netherlands has asked the UN climate change panel to explain an inaccurate claim in a landmark 2007 report that more than half the country was below sea level, the Dutch government said Friday.
    According to the Dutch authorities, only 26 percent of the country is below sea level, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will be asked to account for its figures, environment ministry spokesman Trimo Vallaart told AFP.

    The incident could cause further embarrassment for the IPCC, which recently admitted a claim in the same report that global warming could melt Himalayan glaciers by 2035 was wrong.

    IPCC experts calculated that 55 percent of the Netherlands was below sea level by adding the area below sea level — 26 percent — to the area threatened by river flooding — 29 percent — Vallaart said.

    “They should have been clearer,” Vallaart said, adding that the Dutch office for environmental planning, an IPCC partner, had exact figures.

    Correcting the error had been “on the agenda several times” but had never actually happened, Vallaart said.

    The spokesman said he regretted the fact that proper procedure was not followed and said it should not be left to politicians to check the IPCC’s numbers.

    The Dutch environment ministry will order a review of the report to see if it contains any more errors, Vallaart said.

    The IPCC’s 938-page Fourth Assessment Report spurred politicians around the world to vow action with its warning that climate change was on the march, but the body has faced fierce criticism over the glacier mistake.

    Glaciologists have discredited the Himalaya claim, which is being withdrawn, and the controversy has given fresh ammunition to climate sceptics.

    No evidence could be found to show the claim had been published in a peer-reviewed journal and reports in Britain have said the reference came from green group the WWF, who in turn sourced it to the New Scientist magazine.

  8. Interesting op ed in The Globe and Mail titled The Great Global Warming Collapse. I disagree with some of her assumptions but she details the collapse of the movement well.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/the-great-global-warming-collapse/article1458206/

  9. The readers of the Vineyard Gazette might enjoy this look at some of the climate scientists who are quoted as signing a letter that states that climate change is not happening or is beneficial to the planet.

    This is from The 14 Most Heinous Climate Villains
    By Michael Roddy and Ian Murphy, Buffalo Beast. Posted January 6, 2010.

    The worst and most vile of the corporate-funded climate science deniers responsible for subverting public understanding of climate change, and risking civilization.
    The science of climate change is pretty basic: humans dig up fossilized carbon to fuel power plants and internal combustion machines, releasing CO2 into the atmosphere. Result: greenhouse effect global heating. Around 50% of all the species on the planet are predicted to become extinct by 2100 in the CO2-as-usual model. Our own species will face drought, famine, rising tides, soaring temperatures, calamity and chaos. Hundreds of millions will become climate refugees. Billions may die from starvation, genocide and war. We have precious little time to mitigate this looming global catastrophe.
    Those of us still denying the depressing facts are either tragically stupid or profoundly corrupt or both. If there’s anyone alive to write the history of corporate funded climate science denial, the following list of 15 Heinous Climate Villains will, by the sheer magnitude of death their lies wrought, make the infamous dictatorial monsters of the 20th century seem like incompetent children.

    Sallie Baliunas, George C. Marshall Institute
    Misdeeds: As an astrophysicist and ruthless GOP housewife lookalike, Baliunas lends both credibility and aesthetic reassurance to the denier movement. Claimed in a 2003 paper that “The Medieval Warming Period was hotter than today.” (Actually, it’s hotter today than it’s been for 130,000 years.) Her article in Climate Research was so riddled with errors, and so subverted the peer review process, the editor and half of the journal’s editorial board resigned. This led to celebrity status in the denier world, where if research is published that makes top scientists throw up, it must be accurate.
    Corporate teats: George C. Marshall Institute, Exxon, Competitive Enterprise Institute, American Petroleum Institute and any far right group that needs a convention speaker who isn’t senile and doesn’t spit while talking.
    Richard Lindzen, MIT
    Misdeeds: The professor’s predilection for citing bad data to try to refute widely accepted climate science is a black eye for the state of Massachusetts and research institutes everywhere. Lindzen thinks global warming is basically a “political” issue, and yet has not provided compelling scientific evidence for his contrarian views. When not writing comedy for his peers or the Wall Street Journal, Lindzen plays keynote speaker for any loony tune denial fest that will have him. Claims that water vapor is the main cause of global warming.
    Corporate teats: Heartland Institute, Cato Institute and the Annapolis Center, a think tank funded by ExxonMobil.

  10. Kudos to ‘corporate mouthpieces’.
    Isn’t it interesting how the global warming deniers are so completely aligned politically with so much of the right wing agenda?
    And then there are those people who point to any big snowstorm anywhere in the world as proof positive of the non-existence of global warming.
    The sad truth is that so much of America has been dumbed down for so long that the idiotic thinking on the part of so many people has been enabled and even elevated to untold heights.
    Who needs science when you have YoutTube?
    Keep thinking, ‘Thinker’.

  11. The Left Wing Loons just cant let it go when they are Wrong! They Lie, Denie and Demand Proof as they are dragged out of office screaming and crying or if they are caught Red Handed illegally pushing their agenda! What a terrible way to live! “Although I am Totally Surrounded that just Simplifies my Problem”!

  12. RFK, Jr. 15 months ago: Global warming means no snow or cold in Washington, D.C.
    ..LIBERAL,Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who flies around on private planes so as to tell larger numbers of people how they must live their lives in order to save the planet, wrote a column last year on the lack of winter weather in Washington, D.C.

    Read more at == http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html

  13. Folks we are allegedly talking about a consruction project in OAK BUFFS. This is an act local kind of issue. Should we convene a meeting for those of you who in no way address the LOCAL issue here. Do any of you volunteer in the community or do anything more than belly ache about items you have no hope of resolving?

  14. Despite the snowstorm this week in Washington D.C., 2009 was the 2nd hottest year since 1880, when modern temperature measurements began, according to NASA. The hottest year ever recorded was 2005 and 9 of the 10 hottest years on record have been in the last decade (1998 being the one exception).

  15. Peter, you make this too easy. NASA’s climate change team is headed by James Hansen. Yes the same James Hansen who concluded we were headed towards an Ice Age back in the ’70’s. Here’s a great article about a high school student in Maine who orrectly debunks NASA’s findings
    http://newsbusters.org/node/13282

  16. Why am I not surprised that – Peter Brannen is from West Tisbury!

    Oh yea BTW, EPW HEARINGS ON GLOBAL WARMING POSTPONED DUE TO WEATHER (SNOW!!!)

    http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=15704546335&topic=31294

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *