Sometimes you have to look a gift horse in the mouth. That was the lesson of a hand Paul Laliberte and I played in an OKBridge tournament last week. We were sitting North-South, with South dealing and no one vulnerable:
NORTH (Kaplan)
♠ 10 8 4 2
♥ 5
♦ A K 8 4
♣ 10 9 8 5
WEST EAST
♠ A Q 6 5 3 ♠ K J
♥ A 10 7 ♥ 9 8 6 4 2
♦ J 7 2 ♦ 10 9 6 5 3
♣ Q 3 ♣ A
SOUTH (Laliberte)
♠ 9 7
♥ K Q J 3
♦ Q
♣ K J 7 6 4 2
The bidding proceeded as follows:
South West North East
1 ♣ 1 ♠ 2 ♣ 2 ♠
3 ♣ 3 ♠ Pass Pass
4 ♣ All Pass
Opening lead: ♦ 2
Now, you may wonder why West didn’t lead the ♠A. On the opening lead it’s usually a bad idea to play the ace when you don’t have the king behind it, because you may be giving the opponents a free trick. Granted, playing spades on Tricks One and Two would have worked in this case.
Seeing the diamond lead, I thought, “This is fantastic. Paul will win with the queen in his hand, lead the ♥K, eventually ruff a heart on the board, and have two more diamond tricks.”
Paul was thinking deeper. He realized that if he cashed the ♦Q and led a heart, the defenders would win with the ace, cash two spades and set us with the ♣A. Therefore he won with the ♦A and threw a spade on the ♦K.
When Paul subsequently led a club, East won with the ace. The defenders cashed a spade, but Paul ruffed the second spade lead, cashed his ♣K, conceded a heart and claimed. Our score of +130 gave us 2.29 international match points. As a result, we placed 21st in the 88-pair event and earned a hard-won .37 of a matchpoint.
So the next time you think you’ve been gifted extra tricks, play carefully and count your losers first.
Comments
Comment policy »