Pre-empts can be fun for bidders and hellish for opponents. Here’s perhaps the most satisfying interference bid I’ve seen. In an OK Bridge game I played with Paul Laliberte, East -West were vulnerable and South was dealing:
NORTH (Kaplan)
♠️ 4
♥️ J 8 7 6
♦️ 9 6 5
♣️ K J 9 7 3
WEST EAST
♠️ A 5 2 ♠️ 9 8 6
♥️ Q 10 5 ♥️ A K 4
♦️ Q J 10 ♦️ A K 7 4 3
♣️ A Q 5 2 ♣️ 8 4
SOUTH (Laliberte)
♠️ K Q J 10 7 3
♥️ 9 3 2
♦️ 8 2
♣️ 10 6
The bidding proceeded as follows:
South West North East
2♠️ All Pass
Opening lead: ♦️Q
We went down three for -150, a terrific result that won us 5.16 international matchpoints (imps), because other East-West pairs played in 3NT and socked North-South for -630.
West might have overcalled 2NT (and been raised to 3NT), but with no running suit and unfavorable vulnerability, the pass was understandable. What’s important is that South’s pre-empt got into West’s head and ruined what might have been a simple 1NT-3NT auction for our opponents.
Not that we’re never the victims. The following day we were sitting North-South, with West dealing and North-South vulnerable:
NORTH (Laliberte)
♠️ Q 10
♥️ A K Q 3
♦️ A Q 5
♣️ J 9 8 2
WEST EAST
♠️ A 9 5 4 3 2 ♠️ J 8 6
♥️ 6 ♥️ 7 4
♦️ J 10 9 8 3 ♦️ 7 4 2
♣️ 4 ♣️ 10 7 6 5 3
SOUTH (Kaplan)
♠️ K 7
♥️ J 10 9 8 5 2
♦️ K 6
♣️ A K Q
The bidding proceeded as follows:
West North East South
2♠️ DBL Pass 4♥️
All Pass
Opening lead: ♦️J
We gnashed our teeth while taking all the tricks for +720, earning -4.74 imps in the process. We’d been victimized by West’s pre-empt.
Now, making a weak two bid with that crummy ace-sixth of spades was not for everyone. But as Eddie Kantar advises his readers, when the temptation to pre-empt invades your mind, go for it.
Here’s how we’d have bid with no pre-empt to complicate things:
West North East South
Pass 1♦️ Pass 1♥️
Pass 3♥️ Pass 4NT
Pass 5♦️• Pass 6♥️
All Pass
• Shows three of the five “key cards” (four aces, ♥️K)
PS: East might have really messed us up by raising to 3♠️!
Comments
Comment policy »